Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sannia,
- Comparison Analysis of EPMS and TABU/PSO EPMS Routing Protocol in WSN
Abstract Views :182 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Engineering, CT Institute of Engineering and Management Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Computer Engineering, CT Institute of Engineering and Management Technology, Jalandhar, Punjab, IN
Source
International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, Vol 11, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 4150-4154Abstract
Routing in wireless sensor network is a key challenge. The appropriate routing is done in wsn by using swarm intelligence approach. Various swarm intelligence techniques are available like ant colony optimization, particle swarm optimization, artificial bee colony optimization etc. But hybrid approach of TABU and PSO is a promising one. The integration of TS to PSO allows algorithm to sustain the population diversity and avoiding directing to misguiding local optima. Average energy consumption is high in TS as comparison with PSO and less calculation time is utilized in TS than PSO. The output of the experiment show that the optimize algorithm not only reduce the number of paths but also finding the shortest path at the place of largest path. The simulation result shows that combination of TABU-PSO performs better than Energy Efficient PSO in terms of dead nodes, alive nodes and throughput of the network.Keywords
Wireless Sensor Networks, Routing, TABU/PSO Dead Nodes, Alive Nodes and Throughput.Full Text
References
- W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, H. Balakrishnan, “Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks,” in: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.1-10, 2000.
- O. Younis, S. Fahmy, “HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad-hoc sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 3 (2004)36᷃6–379.
- S. Lee, J. Yoo, T. Chung, “Distance-based energy efficient clustering in wireless sensor networks,” in: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, pp.567– 568, 2004.
- Wang. J, Cao. Y et al., “ Particle Swarm optimization based clustering algorithm with mobile sink for WSNs”, Future Generation computer system(2016).
- Shalli Rani ,Jyoteesh Malhotra,Rajneesh Talwar,Energy “Efficient chain cooperative routing protocol for WSN”, Applied Soft Computing, Elsevier,pp.386-397,2015.
- Neeraj, Varsha Sahni, “Review on State-Of-The-Art of PEGASIS Protocol in WSNS”, Volume 5 Issue 7, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication (IJRITCC), ISSN: 2321-8169, PP: 803 – 807,2017.
- Liu, W., Lu, K., Wang, J., Xing, G. and Huang, L.(2012), “Performance analysis of wireless sensor networks with mobile sinks”, IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, vol. 61, pp.2777-2788.
- Glover, F. (1989). Tabu search—part I. ORSA Journal on computing, 1(3), 190-206.
- Bala, M., & Kumar, M. (2019). Randomization of Node Scheme with Optimization in Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, 10(5), 3999-4006.
- Basavaraj, G. N., & Jaidhar, C. D. (2019). Intersecting Sensor Range Cluster-based Routing Algorithm for Enhancing Energy in WSN. International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, 10(4), 3938-3943.